Parallelization Workflow
Definition
A workflow that runs multiple LLM calls simultaneously, then aggregates the results. Has two key variations: sectioning and voting.
Key points
- Sectioning — breaking a task into independent subtasks run in parallel.
- Voting — running the same task multiple times to get diverse outputs.
- When to use: when "divided subtasks can be parallelized for speed," or when multiple perspectives/attempts are needed for higher confidence.
- Distinct from Orchestrator-Workers Workflow: here the subtasks are pre-defined, not decided by an orchestrator at runtime.
Why it matters for the exam
- "Parallelization" is a named workflow pattern; be able to name and distinguish its two variants — sectioning (speed) vs voting (confidence).
Common gotchas
- Start simple; only add agentic complexity when it demonstrably improves outcomes — parallelization assumes the subtasks are already known and independent.
See also
Sources
Referenced by
Practice questions optional · AI
Generate fresh practice questions about this concept with AI. These are not vault-verified.